Thursday, November 30, 2006

The Sun Responds


Yesterday, Edward Glaeser, Harvard Professor and Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute wrote a response to Tom Wolfe's NY Times Op-Ed in the New York Sun. Like Wolfe, Glaeser looked closely at the battle over 980 Madison Avenue and criticized the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Unlike Wolfe, however, Glaeser claimed that the Landmarks Preservation Commission has done too much to save landmarks. In fact, he believes that the Commission is a powerful, unchecked government agency which has blocked or altered too many development projects. This, he believes, has contributed to the city's affordable housing crisis and has negatively affected the economy.

What do you think? Is landmark preservation really responsible for the city's housing crisis? Does a handful of apartments for millionaires really help? If landmarks is so out of control why are great buildings still being demolished all around the city?

You can read the Sun piece here and then give us your thoughts by pressing the comments link, located at the end of this blog post.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

A little History on Commissioner Independence

Tom Wolfe's two page NYT op-ed assessment of the current sad state of affairs at the Landmarks Preservation Commission decries the role recent Mayors have played in the landmarks arena. It wasn't always that way.

At the swearing in of LPC's second chair, Harmon Goldstone in 1968, then Mayor Lindsay was quoted as saying "I don't interfere with the designation of landmarks any more than I do with teachers and policemen. But when in any doubt on landmarks, I say, designate." One of the goal's of CECPP's campaign (and that's what it is, a true campaign) is to get mayoral candidates to embrace our three point agenda for reforming the LPC: adequate funding , transparency in procedures , and independence in decision-making . Not being a charitable organization (legally or by inclination) we have the luxury of being as political as we want and we plan to make the most of it.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Commissioner Independence

By now, you probably read Tom Wolfe's Op-Ed in the Sunday New York Times, tracing the rise and fall of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. One of the key themes in Wolfe's piece is the Commission's Lack of Independence , which is made worse by the fact that Mayor has failed to reappoint or replace 9 of the 11 Commissioners whose terms have lapsed. Why is this so important? By failing to reappoint or replace commissioners, the Mayor enjoys additional influence over their decisions and can immediately remove Commissioners who fail to vote his way. As Wolfe pointed out, this is not a recent phenomenon but rather a practice that dates back through several administrations. Nonetheless, the law requires the Mayor to make these appointments and the failure to do so is grounds for a legal challenge.

In the coming weeks, the Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation will be filing a legal challenge known as a Mandamus Proceeding, to force the Mayor to make the appointments he is required to make under the law. Already, 16 individuals have joined as petitioners in the lawsuit and the list grows every day. Are you interested in joining our effort? If so, email the Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation at citizens@savelpc.org . Join us today!

Monday, November 27, 2006

On Tom Wolfe's Op-Ed


Sometimes, when writing a blog post, it is just better to write a few words and link directly to an article which pretty much says it all. Yesterday, author Tom Wolfe wrote a passionate, witty Op-Ed, tracing the rise of the
Landmarks Preservation Commission and its recent downfall.

The piece covers commissioner independence (one of CECPP's main concerns) and even mentions our November 13th Summit .

You can read the article in the Times here . As always, the article will soon disappear into the "pay only" section of the New York Times site, so if you want to read it for free, you can also find it on the Historic Districts Council Blog .

Photo via Tomwolfe.com .

Friday, November 24, 2006

When Black Friday Comes...

Today is Black Friday, one of the busiest shopping days of the year and not a particularly good day to publish substantive blog posts. Still, as you think about how to spend your money this holiday season, please consider donating to our campaign. It may be the end of 2006, but our fight has just begun!

Thursday, November 23, 2006

Happy Thanksgiving!


We hope you have a landmark holiday with your friends and family.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

A Couple of Press Hits

It's always nice when your organization is mentioned in the press. It certainly helps to raise your visibility and publicize your work, especially when the mention is in New York Magazine and the New York Sun.

Today's New York Sun features a great summary on CECPP's November 13th Summit and a report on our focused agenda. You can read the article, by Gary Shapiro, here .

Also, in this week's New York Magazine, the Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation was mentioned in the context of the fight over the First Baptist Church on West 79th Street in Manhattan. The church's board is considering selling the property to a condo developer in exchange for a more practical space for their small congregation.

Let's be clear about this: individual members of CECPP may be concerned about the future of the First Baptist Church, but the organization itself does not have a position. In fact, we won't take a position on any individual landmark fight. We seek to address the Lack of Fairness in the landmarking process, Lack of Independence on the Landmarks Preservation Commission and a Lack of Resources set aside to implement and enforce the city's landmarks law.

Oh well, at least the mention will help to improve our visibility on Google .

You can read the New York Magazine article here .

Landmarks Update

The New York Observer is reporting that the Landmarks Preservation Commission has voted to landmark the City and Suburban buildings that were in danger of development on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The project will go before the City Council, but given the fact that the City and Suburban complex is in Council Member Jessica Lappin's District (Chair of the Landmarks, Public Siting and Maritime Uses Committee and advocate for saving the buildings) it's likely that the Commission's vote will be upheld.

More on the vote here .

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

What We're Thankful For

At this time of year preservationists should count among their blessings our landmarks law. We must also honor the old maxim: to whom much is given, much is expected. Even at the law's passage, it was recognized that the creation of the law did not end the landmark struggle. In June of 1965 Edward R. Finch, Jr., the counsel of the Municipal Art Society wrote in the Society's newsletter, "We have won an important legislative battle but it is not the end of the Landmark's war by any means. Vigilance is the price of preservation." The New York Times echoed these sentiments in its editorial, "A Landmark Law," April 27, 1965. "After a long hard fight that was going on while historic buildings were being knocked down like ten-pins, New York finally has a landmarks preservation law. The law is an immense achievement, but it gives no guarantee that anything can be saved. It is only a protective tool to make historic and esthetic preservation possible."

The landmark's war still rages and depends on an engaged citizenry. If you care about New York's landmarks, both the protected and unprotected, join our efforts to save the integrity of the landmarks law. Even with the law, saving buildings is a struggle, but without it, you know the answer. The emergency facing the LPC calls us all to action. It is our responsibility to be vigilant--this is not a time for armchair preservationists and fair weather activists--the times require us to be bold. E-mail us with your thoughts on how to advance our three plank platform for reform.

Monday, November 20, 2006

DUMBO Preservation Fight



The DUMBO (Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass) section of Brooklyn has undergone quite a change over the past 20 years: from manufacturing hub to luxury loft district. In the wake of these changes, many preservation fights have been waged to help save the historic old buildings that help to make the area so unique. The Brooklyn-focused blog Brownstoner is reporting that yet-another such fight is about to begin, and this one has a familiar theme.

According to Brownstoner, the current fight is over 205 Water/188 Plymouth Street, a "19th Century foundry, which was built by E.W. Bliss, a builder of the Brooklyn Bridge." The Landmarks Preservation Commission may hold a hearing on the building as early as December, but it looks like the developer may get permits to demolish the structure before then. Sounds a lot like the Dakota Stable and countless other landmark fights throughout the city, doesn't it?

More on the fight over 205 Water/188 Plymouth Street here .


Learn more about the DUMBO Neighborhood Association and their efforts to create an historic district here .

Friday, November 17, 2006

Busy Week for City Landmarks



On Sunday, the New York Times ran a story on the City and Suburban apartments, a historic model tenement complex on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Community advocates and Council Member Jessica Lappin (who is also the new chair of the Landmarks, Public Siting and Maritime Uses Committee ) have fought to save two of the buildings from a proposed tower development while attempting to undo a deal by the former Board of Estimate which stripped the buildings of their landmark status. As Council Member Lappin noted: "What happened was a mistake in government...And I view this as an exciting and unique opportunity to fix what was a bad backroom deal."

Then, the Times wrote another story on Wednesday, November 15th regarding the Dakota Stable on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. The building itself is of course important to save but the story of the stables provides an excellent example of the shocking loopholes and lack of agency coordination in the landmarking process. In this case, the developers were able to get Department of Buildings permits to begin demolition before the stables were considered by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. This caused quite a stir at the Commission, as the buildings were then disqualified for landmarking and will therefore soon be completely demolished with the city's blessing.

So let's recap what the Times has "uncovered" here during this busy week for city landmarks: back room deals, loopholes in the landmarks process and a shocking lack of agency coordination.
Sounds like a job for the Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation. Our campaign seeks to solve the three major problems in the landmarking process: a Lack of Fairness in the Process , a Lack of Independence on the Commission and a chronic Lack of Resources . Join our growing movement today!

More on the City and Suburban complex here .
More on the Dakota Stable saga here .
Word to the wise: read the stories soon before the Times makes you pay for them!

Similar stories just like the Dakota Stable have been played out in all five boroughs. Tell us your stories about buildings lost in your neighborhood by pressing the "Comments" link below.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

On the Summit

Note: SaveLPC.org went live on November 15th. From now on, we plan to post something new on our blog every day.

On Monday, November 13th, nearly 100 preservationists from all five boroughs, along with elected officials and press, came together in midtown Manhattan to help kick off the Citizen's Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation's campaign to reform the city's Landmark process. Attendees learned about CECPP's legislative, legal and budget agenda, gave their much-needed input, and raised more than $1,000 for the campaign's war chest. This brief summary really doesn't describe the true spirit of the night, but the summit's closing statement by CECPP Steering Committee member Anthony Wood did. Here is an excerpt of his rousing speech:


You and I are here tonight because we recognize it is our duty to step forward and do something to address the preservation emergency that exists today in NYC.

Since 1994 the Landmarks Preservation Commission has been on a downward trajectory. Those whose interactions with the commission only began during this period have never witnessed what a fair and transparent Commission, fully using the powers of the landmarks law and driven by a true preservation ethic, can accomplish.

After a dozen years of constant erosion, we have a commission that is reaching the tipping point—a true point of no return. Unless the three issues raised this evening [the campaign’s call for fairness, independence, and funding] are successfully addressed, the landmarks law will have been operationally rewritten to undermine its ability to preserve and protect our city’s landmarks. These past 12 years will have successfully wiped out any memory of the 29 years of Commission policies, values, and ethics that preceded them.

During the decline of the last dozen years, most preservationists have been silently, and a few less silently, complaining about the sorry state of affairs at the commission. There has been much hand wringing, report writing, quiet conversations with people in power, and considerable private bitching and moaning. However, the assessment was made that nothing could be done and anyway, the next Administration would solve the problem. The success of this strategy is all around us: demolished and stripped landmark quality buildings and the further erosion of commission procedures and policies. If anything, the signal sent to future administration has been that preservation community will put up with anything.

It is time for a different approach. It is time to go public. In social organizing there is the old manta: “speak truth to power.” Such action has brought about larger social change that the modest reforms we seek. It is time to do what needs to be done whether using the courts, the legislature, the press, or the political process. The strategy outlined tonight is in its infancy, it will need to evolve and be refined, but at least it represents a new start.

In the history of preservation in New York, there are countless examples of where individual citizens have stepped up and joined together with likeminded folks, to fight the good fight for preservation. Such efforts have begun with fewer numbers than are here tonight and with even fewer dollars in the bank. Such efforts have taken on equally daunting odds—and they have won. They have addressed equally thorny problems, and solved them. We can too.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Welcome to www.SaveLPC.org!

In May 2006, a group of concerned New Yorkers formed the Citizens Emergency Committee to Preserve Preservation to focus attention on our city’s landmark emergency and to implement a campaign to aggressively reform the city's broken landmarks process. Over the next year or two, we intend to:

* Ensure Fairness: The City's Landmark's Preservation Commission (LPC), the agency charged with designating and regulating the city's landmarks, needs new procedures to improve openness and responsiveness to the public. No more deals behind closed doors!

* Reestablish Commission Independence: Landmarks Commissioners, who are appointed by the Mayor, should be properly qualified when they are chosen for the job. Once appointed, they should be free to make the decisions that they think are right.

* Secure Appropriate Resources: The LPC needs more staff and funding to meet the mandates spelled out in the city's Landmarks Law.

SaveLPC.org is one of the tools we inted to use to bring attention to the city's growing landmarks emergency. What you are reading right now is our official blog. Stop by every day to read the latest on our campaign and to learn more about landmark concerns in all five boroughs. This site also functions as a fundraising tool. If you like what you see and you support our mission, consider pressing the Make a Contribution button on the bottom left of this page. Every little bit helps!

Finally, our campaign is hosting a Preservation Summit tonight at the General Society of Mechanics and Tradesmen, 20 West 44th Street , Room 506. There is a reception at 6:00 and the program begins at 6:30. If you are available, drop by, meet the the campaign's Steering Committee and members and learn more about what we plan to do and what you can do to help!